Analysis of Partially Confined Blast Experiments and Simulations
Data and simulation results presented by Teland et al. (2018) for incident and reflected pressure histories indicated the simulation results time of arrival and pressure magnitude did not agree well with the data for the reflected shock. They posited three possibilities for the differences: (1) Charge load (explosive mass per chamber volume), (2) Afterburning and (3) Variable Gamma for the gas mixture.
https://www.dynalook.com/conferences/13th-european-ls-dyna-conference-2021/impact-blast/schwer-l_paper.pdf/view
https://www.dynalook.com/@@site-logo/DYNAlook-Logo480x80.png
Analysis of Partially Confined Blast Experiments and Simulations
Data and simulation results presented by Teland et al. (2018) for incident and reflected pressure histories indicated the simulation results time of arrival and pressure magnitude did not agree well with the data for the reflected shock. They posited three possibilities for the differences: (1) Charge load (explosive mass per chamber volume), (2) Afterburning and (3) Variable Gamma for the gas mixture.
Schwer,L_PAPER.pdf
— 838.6 KB